|
No Records Found
| Id |
|
| Title |
|
| Date |
|
| Country |
UNITED STATES (North and Central America)
| |
|
| Adjudication body |
|
| Territorial scope |
|
Domestic
| |
|
| Case number |
|
| Main themes |
Hate speech Hate speech - Racism and xenophobia National Security
| |
|
| Type of expression |
Dark humour Impersonation and misattribution Name or logo Parody or pastiche Photograph, photomontage, or manipulated image Sexual, LGBTQ+, or gender humour Social media
| |
|
| Branch of law |
Civil Law Constitutional Law
| |
|
| Decision direction |
|
Mixed outcome
| |
|
| Outcome |
Inadmissible / Request denied / Dismissed
| |
|
| Outcome note |
|
| Relation to previous decision |
|
Agreement
| |
|
| Speaker |
Gender_Man Private individual
| |
|
| Target |
Politician, public officer, or public body
| |
|
| Link to case |
|
| Link to analysis |
|
| Related decisions |
|
| Summary |
Anthony Novak created a Facebook page parodying the Parma city police department’s page using the same name, cover photograph and profile picture. He included posts on the page announcing a recruitment policy which strongly encouraged minorities not to apply and promoting a fictious fair where sex-offenders could remove their names from the registry by completing a series of puzzles.
He was arrested under a law which made it a felony to interfere with police operations but then acquitted. He sued the police for violating his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and his fourth amendment right to freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. The officers were granted qualified immunity.
Novak subsequently petitioned the court to establish 1) whether an officer is entitled to qualified immunity for arresting an individual based solely on speech parodying the government, so long as no case has previously held the particular speech is protected; and (2) whether the court should reconsider the doctrine of qualified immunity. Satirical news site The Onion filed an amicus brief in support of Novak’s petition from the Court of Appeals’ subsequent ruling for the officers.
The petition was denied on 21/02/2023. Therefore, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment on Novak’s civil claims.
More information on this case in available here: https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/novak-v-city-of-parma-ohio/
| |
|
|
|