Processing......
Processing......
Warning
Close
Close
PDF
Print
No Records Found
Id
383
383
Title
Mercis c.s. v. Punt.nl
Date
13/09/2011
dd/mm/yyyy
Country
NETHERLANDS (Europe)
AFGHANISTAN (Asia)
ALBANIA (Europe)
ALGERIA (Africa)
AMERICAN SAMOA (Oceania)
ANDORRA (Europe)
ANGOLA (Africa)
ANGUILLA (North and Central America)
ANTARCTICA (Antarctica)
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA (North and Central America)
ARGENTINA (South America)
ARMENIA (Asia)
ARUBA (North and Central America)
AUSTRALIA (Oceania)
AUSTRIA (Europe)
AZERBAIJAN (Asia)
BAHAMAS (North and Central America)
BAHRAIN (Asia)
BANGLADESH (Asia)
BARBADOS (North and Central America)
BELARUS (Europe)
BELGIUM (Europe)
BELIZE (North and Central America)
BENIN (Africa)
BERMUDA (North and Central America)
BHUTAN (Asia)
BOLIVIA (South America)
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (Europe)
BOTSWANA (Africa)
BRAZIL (South America)
BRITISH INDIAN OCEAN TERRITORY (Europe)
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM (Asia)
BULGARIA (Europe)
BURKINA FASO (Africa)
BURUNDI (Africa)
CAMBODIA (Asia)
CAMEROON (Africa)
CANADA (North and Central America)
CAPE VERDE (Africa)
CAYMAN ISLANDS (North and Central America)
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC (Africa)
CHAD (Africa)
CHILE (South America)
CHINA (Asia)
CHRISTMAS ISLAND (Oceania)
COCOS (KEELING) ISLANDS (Oceania)
COLOMBIA (South America)
COMOROS (Africa)
CONGO (Africa)
CONGO, THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE (Africa)
COOK ISLANDS (Oceania)
COSTA RICA (North and Central America)
COTE D'IVOIRE (Africa)
CROATIA (Europe)
CUBA (North and Central America)
CYPRUS (Asia)
CZECH REPUBLIC (Europe)
DENMARK (Europe)
DJIBOUTI (Africa)
DOMINICA (North and Central America)
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (North and Central America)
ECUADOR (South America)
EGYPT (Africa)
EL SALVADOR (North and Central America)
ENGLAND and WALES (Europe)
EQUATORIAL GUINEA (Africa)
ERITREA (Africa)
ESTONIA (Europe)
ETHIOPIA (Africa)
FALKLAND ISLANDS (MALVINAS) (South America)
FAROE ISLANDS (Europe)
FIJI (Oceania)
FINLAND (Europe)
FRANCE (Europe)
FRENCH GUIANA (South America)
FRENCH POLYNESIA (Oceania)
FRENCH SOUTHERN TERRITORIES (Antarctica)
GABON (Africa)
GAMBIA (Africa)
GEORGIA (Asia)
GERMANY (Europe)
GHANA (Africa)
GIBRALTAR (Europe)
GREECE (Europe)
GREENLAND (North and Central America)
GRENADA (North and Central America)
GUADELOUPE (North and Central America)
GUAM (Oceania)
GUATEMALA (North and Central America)
GUINEA (Africa)
GUINEA-BISSAU (Africa)
GUYANA (South America)
HAITI (North and Central America)
HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS (Oceania)
HOLY SEE (VATICAN CITY STATE) (Europe)
HONDURAS (North and Central America)
HONG KONG (Asia)
HUNGARY (Europe)
ICELAND (Europe)
INDIA (Asia)
INDONESIA (Asia)
IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF (Asia)
IRAQ (Asia)
IRELAND (Europe)
ISRAEL (Asia)
ITALY (Europe)
JAMAICA (North and Central America)
JAPAN (Asia)
JERSEY (Europe)
JORDAN (Asia)
KAZAKHSTAN (Asia)
KENYA (Africa)
KIRIBATI (Oceania)
KOREA, DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF (Asia)
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF (Asia)
KUWAIT (Asia)
KYRGYZSTAN (Asia)
LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (Asia)
LATVIA (Europe)
LEBANON (Asia)
LESOTHO (Africa)
LIBERIA (Africa)
LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA (Africa)
LIECHTENSTEIN (Europe)
LITHUANIA (Europe)
LUXEMBOURG (Europe)
MACAO (Asia)
MACEDONIA, THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF (Europe)
MADAGASCAR (Africa)
MALAWI (Africa)
MALAYSIA (Asia)
MALDIVES (Asia)
MALI (Africa)
MALTA (Europe)
MARSHALL ISLANDS (Oceania)
MARTINIQUE (North and Central America)
MAURITANIA (Africa)
MAURITIUS (Africa)
MAYOTTE (Europe)
MEXICO (North and Central America)
MICRONESIA, FEDERATED STATES OF (Oceania)
MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF (Europe)
MONACO (Europe)
MONGOLIA (Asia)
MONTENEGRO (Europe)
MONTSERRAT (North and Central America)
MOROCCO (Africa)
MOZAMBIQUE (Africa)
MYANMAR (Asia)
NAMIBIA (Africa)
NAURU (Oceania)
NEPAL (Asia)
NETHERLANDS (Europe)
NEW CALEDONIA (Oceania)
NEW ZEALAND (Oceania)
NICARAGUA (North and Central America)
NIGER (Africa)
NIGERIA (Africa)
NIUE (Oceania)
NORFOLK ISLAND (Oceania)
NORTHERN IRELAND (Europe)
NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (Oceania)
NORWAY (Europe)
OMAN (Asia)
PAKISTAN (Asia)
PALAU (Oceania)
PALESTINE (Asia)
PANAMA (North and Central America)
PAPUA NEW GUINEA (Oceania)
PARAGUAY (South America)
PERU (South America)
PHILIPPINES (Asia)
PITCAIRN (Oceania)
POLAND (Europe)
PORTUGAL (Europe)
PUERTO RICO (North and Central America)
QATAR (Asia)
REUNION (Africa)
ROMANIA (Europe)
RUSSIAN FEDERATION (Europe)
RWANDA (Africa)
SAINT HELENA (Africa)
SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS (North and Central America)
SAINT LUCIA (North and Central America)
SAINT PIERRE AND MIQUELON (North and Central America)
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES (North and Central America)
SAMOA (Oceania)
SAN MARINO (Europe)
SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE (Africa)
SAUDI ARABIA (Asia)
SCOTLAND (Europe)
SENEGAL (Africa)
SERBIA (Europe)
SEYCHELLES (Africa)
SIERRA LEONE (Africa)
SINGAPORE (Asia)
SLOVAKIA (Europe)
SLOVENIA (Europe)
SOLOMON ISLANDS (Oceania)
SOMALIA (Africa)
SOUTH AFRICA (Africa)
SOUTH GEORGIA AND THE SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS (South America)
SPAIN (Europe)
SRI LANKA (Asia)
SUDAN (Africa)
SURINAME (South America)
SVALBARD AND JAN MAYEN (Europe)
SWAZILAND (Africa)
SWEDEN (Europe)
SWITZERLAND (Europe)
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC (Asia)
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA (Asia)
TAJIKISTAN (Asia)
TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC OF (Africa)
THAILAND (Asia)
TIMOR-LESTE (Asia)
TOGO (Africa)
TOKELAU (Oceania)
TONGA (Oceania)
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (North and Central America)
TUNISIA (Africa)
TURKMENISTAN (Asia)
TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS (North and Central America)
TUVALU (Oceania)
TÜRKIYE (Asia)
UGANDA (Africa)
UKRAINE (Europe)
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (Asia)
UNITED KINGDOM (Europe)
UNITED STATES (North and Central America)
UNITED STATES MINOR OUTLYING ISLANDS (North and Central America)
URUGUAY (South America)
UZBEKISTAN (Asia)
VANUATU (Oceania)
VENEZUELA (South America)
VIET NAM (Asia)
VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH (North and Central America)
VIRGIN ISLANDS, U.S. (North and Central America)
WALLIS AND FUTUNA (Oceania)
WESTERN SAHARA (Africa)
YEMEN (Asia)
ZAMBIA (Africa)
ZIMBABWE (Africa)
Judicial Body
Court of Appeal
Case number
200.054.943/01
Main themes
Apology of terrorism
Copyright
Image Rights
Right to Reputation
Trade Mark
Anti-Semitism
Apology of terrorism
Bias
Blasphemy
Bullying
Censorship
Contempt of Court
Contract
Copyright
Crimes against Humanity
Defamation
Discrimination
Elections
Employment Tribunal
Fitness to practice
Freedom of Religion
Freedom to impart ideas and information
Harassment
Hate speech
Homophobia
Hooliganism
Illegal activity
Image Rights
Immorality
Incitement of Extremism
Incitement to violence
Insult
Intellectual property
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
Intentional Infliction of Harm
Islamophobia
Judicial Review
Labor Law
Lèse Majesté
Media Platforms' policy/standards
Media Regulation
Misconduct
Misogyny
National Security
Obscenity
Offence
Oversight board
Passing off
Promoting Drug Use
Protest
Public Nuisance
Racism
Respect for private life
Right to be forgotten
Right to human dignity
Right to Reputation
Sedition
Sending a Grossly Offensive Message
Sexual content
SLAPP
Suicide
Terrorism
Threat of violence
Trade Mark
Unlawful Advertising
Type of expression
Dark humor
Website
Advertising
Banter
Blog post
Board game
Book
Broadcast radio
Caricature
Cartoon
Dark humor
Digital Communication
Election
Exaggeration
Film
GIF
Graffiti
Irony
Leaflet / Poster
Magazine
Media
Meme
Metaphor
Mobile app
Music
Newspaper
Painting
Pamphlet
Parody
Performance
Political content
Printed newspaper
Private Joke
Reasonable Reader
Ridicule
Sarcasm
Satire
Sexual content
Social media
Stand-up comedy
stereotyping
Streaming service
Television broadcasting
Verbal joke / pun
Website
Branch of law
Civil Law
Constitutional Law
Criminal Law
International Human Rights Law
Others
Decision direction
Expands expression
Contracts expression
Expands expression
Mixed outcome
Other
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Speaker
Artist or literary author
Cartoonist
Comedian
Content creator
Gender_Man
Gender_Non-binary
Gender_Other
Gender_Woman
Historical figure
Journalist
Judge, lawyer, or other legal professional
Minor
NGOs or other organization
Politician or public officer
Private citizen
Public figure (non-political)
Target
Artist or literary author
Cartoonist
Collective target
Comedian
Content creator
Gender_Man
Gender_Non-binary
Gender_Other
Gender_Woman
Historical figure
Journalist
Judge, lawyer, or other legal professional
Minor
NGOs or other organization
Politician or public officer
Private citizen
Public figure (non-political)
Link to case
Link to analysis
Summary
This case stems from the use of images of the children’s book and toy character “Miffy the rabbit” or “Nijntje” in Dutch, created by Dick Bruna. “Nijntje” is a registered trademark. Mercis owns the Trademark and some distinctive figurative marks of the character.
Seven unauthorised images of Miffy were posted on three websites hosted by the platform punt.nl, one of the largest website hosting companies in the Netherlands. These images depicted Miffy as a criminal, drug user and terrorist. Mercis and Miffy creator Dick Bruna brought legal action against Punt.nl, claiming copyright and trademark rights infringement and Dick Bruna’s personal rights. They requested the removal of these images and that the platform desist from publishing future images.
Punt.nl argued that the copyright exception of parody, as per article 18b of the Dutch Copyright Act covered these uses. In 2009, the District Court of Amsterdam awarded an injunction to two out of the seven drawings accepting the parody defence in part. However the parody exception was rejected for two of the cartoons on the grounds that they affected the reputation of the trademarks by associating Miffy with drug use and terrorism. On appeal the decision was reversed, stating that all the cartoons could be considered parodies and therefore did not infringe any rights.
Appeal dismissed.
This case stems from the use of images of the children’s book and toy character “Miffy the rabbit” or “Nijntje” in Dutch, created by Dick Bruna. “Nijntje” is a registered trademark. Mercis owns the Trademark and some distinctive figurative marks of the character. Seven unauthorised images of Miffy were posted on three websites hosted by the platform punt.nl, one of the largest website hosting companies in the Netherlands. These images depicted Miffy as a criminal, drug user and terrorist. Mercis and Miffy creator Dick Bruna brought legal action against Punt.nl, claiming copyright and trademark rights infringement and Dick Bruna’s personal rights. They requested the removal of these images and that the platform desist from publishing future images. Punt.nl argued that the copyright exception of parody, as per article 18b of the Dutch Copyright Act covered these uses. In 2009, the District Court of Amsterdam awarded an injunction to two out of the seven drawings accepting the parody defence in part. However the parody exception was rejected for two of the cartoons on the grounds that they affected the reputation of the trademarks by associating Miffy with drug use and terrorism. On appeal the decision was reversed, stating that all the cartoons could be considered parodies and therefore did not infringe any rights. Appeal dismissed.
Close
Output